Home
Updated for 2025/26

IR35 Guide for
Contractors

Everything a UK Ltd contractor needs to understand IR35 — the three-limb test, the latest Supreme Court rulings, how client size affects who decides your status, and how Nebula automates your compliance.

Last reviewed June 2026 Hiep Do, FCCA 25 min read
Key IR35 Numbers
3
Core limbs — personal service, control, and terms consistent with employment
20+
HMRC employment status indicators reviewed in a full IR35 assessment
£50k
Small company turnover threshold — below this, you determine your own IR35 status (private sector)
2024
PGMOL Supreme Court ruling — fundamentally changed how Mutuality of Obligation is assessed
Regulatory notice: Nebula provides software and AI-assisted guidance — not regulated financial advice. For complex IR35 disputes, consult a qualified tax adviser.

Important: Nebula Finance provides accounting software and AI-assisted guidance. It does not provide regulated financial advice. The content of this guide is for information purposes only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. For complex IR35 disputes, an active HMRC enquiry, or situations involving significant financial exposure, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. IR35 determinations are highly fact-specific — the principles in this guide are a starting point, not a substitute for professional review.

What is IR35?

IR35 — formally known as the Intermediaries Legislation (Chapter 8, ITEPA 2003 for private sector; Chapter 10 for off-payroll working) — is a set of tax rules that prevents workers from avoiding employment taxes by operating through a limited company when, in substance, they work like employees.

The name comes from the Inland Revenue press release numbered 35, issued in the 2000 Budget. More than two decades later, it remains one of the most contentious and litigated areas of UK tax law.

In practice, IR35 asks a single question: if the worker were engaged directly by the end client — with no limited company in between — would that engagement look like employment? If the answer is yes, the worker is "inside IR35" and subject to PAYE income tax and National Insurance on their earnings from that engagement. If the answer is no, they are "outside IR35" and entitled to the tax efficiencies that come with operating through a Ltd company.

The core distinction

Inside IR35: Your Ltd company fees from the engagement are treated as deemed employment income — subject to PAYE and NICs before you can take them as salary or dividends.

Outside IR35: Your Ltd company is genuinely contracting, and you can extract income in the tax-efficient way a business owner is entitled to — salary up to threshold, dividends on remaining profits, pension contributions, allowable expenses.

Who Does IR35 Apply To?

IR35 applies where all of the following are true:

  • A worker provides services to a client
  • Those services are provided through an intermediary — typically a Ltd company (Personal Service Company / PSC), but also partnerships and managed service companies
  • If the worker were engaged directly by the client, the relationship would resemble employment

It applies to:

  • IT contractors, management consultants, engineers, financial services contractors, and other professional services contractors operating through a PSC
  • Public sector workers in scope have been subject to off-payroll rules since April 2017
  • Private and voluntary sector workers in scope have been subject to the off-payroll rules (Chapter 10) since April 2021

It does not apply to:

  • Sole traders (who are assessed differently under employment status rules)
  • Workers where there is a genuine third-party managed service or Statement of Works relationship
  • Workers engaged by small private-sector clients (who use the original Chapter 8 rules — see Client Size & Liability)

The Three-Limb Test (Ready Mixed Concrete, 1968)

Every IR35 determination begins with the Ready Mixed Concrete test, established by MacKenna J in 1968 and still the starting point for every tribunal and HMRC enquiry today. A contract can only be one of employment if all three limbs are satisfied:

👤
Personal Service
The worker must provide the services personally. A genuine, unfettered right of substitution — where the worker can send someone else without the client's approval — typically defeats this limb.
Outside pointer: real substitution right
🎯
Control
The client must exercise sufficient control over how, when, and where the work is done — not just what the end result is. Post-PGMOL (2024), a contractual framework granting authority to the client is sufficient — actual day-to-day direction is not required.
Inside pointer: client controls method
📋
Employment-Consistent Terms
All other terms and the overall character of the engagement must be consistent with a contract of employment rather than a business relationship. Financial risk, equipment, integration, and "in business on own account" all factor here.
Outside pointer: genuine financial risk

If any one of the three limbs cannot be satisfied, the engagement cannot be a contract of employment — and IR35 does not apply. In practice, the analysis rarely stops at the limbs: tribunals apply a holistic "overall picture" test (confirmed in Kickabout Productions, 2022) once the limbs have been assessed.

The Four-Step Modern Approach

Since the Court of Appeal's ruling in Atholl House (Kaye Adams) and the Supreme Court in PGMOL (2024), tribunals apply a four-step methodology:

  1. Identify the real terms of the engagement — applying Autoclenz principles to look past contract wording to the actual working reality
  2. Apply the Ready Mixed Concrete limbs
  3. Construct the hypothetical direct contract — what would the engagement look like with no PSC in between?
  4. Determine whether that hypothetical contract would be employment, looking at the whole picture

Employment Status Factors

Within the three-limb framework, tribunals and HMRC assessors weigh a range of specific factors. The table below summarises the most significant — note that no single factor is determinative: all must be weighed together.

Factor Points Inside IR35 Points Outside IR35 Weight (post-2024)
Right of substitution Client approval required; right never used; substitute must be worker's employee Genuine, unfettered right; any suitably qualified person acceptable; actually exercised High
Control Client dictates how work is done; attendance required; managed alongside employees; framework contract grants authority Worker controls method; outcomes-based contract; no supervision over day-to-day tasks Very High
Mutuality of Obligation Ongoing expectation of work; client obliged to provide tasks; worker expected to accept new tasks automatically Discrete project with defined deliverable and clear end point; no obligation beyond specific task (post-PGMOL caveat: basic offer/accept is always present) Medium
Financial risk Fixed daily rate; no financial exposure if work is deficient; no own equipment Fixed-price deliverables; responsible for remediation cost; uses own equipment and software High
Integration Rostered alongside employees; given company email; attends internal team meetings and appraisals; included in org chart Clearly external; separate systems; not included in internal management processes High
Multiple clients Financially dependent on a single client; no other business activity Genuine portfolio of clients; demonstrable business activity beyond one engagement Medium
Exclusivity Contractual exclusivity or practical inability to work elsewhere Free to accept other work during the engagement; no exclusivity clause Medium
Provision of equipment Client provides all tools, hardware, software, and office space Worker provides own equipment and working environment Medium-Low
Contract length Open-ended or rolling extensions of indefinite duration Fixed-term tied to specific deliverable; clear end date Low-Medium
Employee benefits Receives holiday pay, sick pay, pension contributions from client No employee-like benefits; entirely self-funding Low
Post-PGMOL caution on Mutuality

Before the September 2024 Supreme Court ruling in PGMOL v HMRC, contractors could often argue that the absence of ongoing obligations to offer and accept work defeated Mutuality of Obligation entirely. The Supreme Court has significantly narrowed this route. Basic mutuality — an offer of work and its acceptance — is always present in any engagement where payment flows. The argument that a short-term engagement has no MoO is no longer viable on its own. You still need to assess control, substitution, and the wider picture.

Client Size and Who Bears Liability

One of the most practically important IR35 questions for contractors is: who decides my status, and who bears the liability if they get it wrong? The answer depends entirely on the size of the end client.

Small Private-Sector Client

Chapter 8 rules (original IR35)

  • You (the worker/PSC) decide your own IR35 status
  • You bear the liability if wrong
  • No obligation on client to issue a Status Determination Statement
  • Small = meets 2 of 3: turnover ≤ £10.2m, balance sheet ≤ £5.1m, employees ≤ 50
  • From April 2025: thresholds increase to turnover ≤ £15m, balance sheet ≤ £7.5m

Medium/Large Private Sector or Public Sector

Chapter 10 off-payroll working rules

  • Client is responsible for determining IR35 status
  • Client must issue a Status Determination Statement (SDS) with reasons
  • Fee payer (client or agency) deducts PAYE and NICs before payment if inside
  • Liability can shift back to client if they fail to take reasonable care
  • PAYE set-off applies from April 2024 — previously paid taxes offset against liability on enquiry

Identifying Your Client's Size

Before starting an engagement, confirm your client's legal size. Ask directly and request written confirmation. A client who is borderline or recently crossed a threshold may be uncertain — do not assume. Misidentifying client size is a compliance risk that sits with you.

From April 2025, the Companies Act thresholds that determine "small" increase for financial years starting on or after 6 April 2025. The impact on off-payroll status for most clients flows through with a delay — HMRC uses the last filed accounts and a two-year test, meaning for most clients the earliest practical impact is the 2027/28 tax year.

The Chain of Liability

Under Chapter 10, the liability chain runs: End Client → Agency (if any) → Fee Payer. If an end client fails to take reasonable care in their determination, or fails to issue an SDS, the liability remains with them rather than flowing down the chain. From 2026, umbrella company rules also impose joint and several liability across the supply chain for unpaid PAYE — if your umbrella fails to pay the correct tax, HMRC can pursue any party in the chain.

Status Determination Statements and CEST

Status Determination Statement (SDS)

Where Chapter 10 applies (medium/large private sector or public sector), the end client must issue a written SDS before payments are made. The SDS must:

  • State whether the worker is inside or outside IR35
  • Set out the reasons for that determination — not merely a conclusion
  • Be provided to both the worker and the next party in the chain (e.g., the agency)

If a client issues an SDS without adequate reasons, or refuses to engage with a dispute, the liability shifts to the client. Workers have the right to dispute an SDS — the client must respond within 45 days with either a new determination or an explanation of why they are standing by the original.

HMRC's CEST Tool

HMRC's Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool is available at tax.service.gov.uk/check-employment-status-for-tax. HMRC has committed to stand behind outcomes produced by CEST provided accurate information is input — making it a valuable tool for demonstrating reasonable care.

CEST limitations

CEST has been repeatedly criticised for not including explicit Mutuality of Obligation questions. The April 2025 refresh of CEST did not address this. CEST does not address all relevant factors and may produce "unable to determine" outputs in borderline cases. An outside CEST result is useful evidence — but it is not conclusive and should be supplemented with a full documented assessment.

Key Case Law: 2024 and 2025

The past two years have produced some of the most significant IR35 and employment status case law since the legislation was introduced. The clear pattern: HMRC is winning, and arguments that previously offered a route outside IR35 are being systematically closed off.

PGMOL v HMRC — Supreme Court
Supreme Court | September 2024
HMRC wins
Football referees working for the Professional Game Match Officials Ltd were found to be employees for tax purposes. The Supreme Court held that basic mutuality — the offer and acceptance of work — was sufficient to satisfy the MoO limb. The absence of an obligation to offer or accept future engagements does not defeat mutuality within the individual engagement itself.
Takeaway for contractors: "No mutuality" is no longer a standalone route outside IR35. Control and substitution are now the primary battlegrounds. Every IR35 position that previously rested heavily on the absence of MoO needs to be reassessed.
S & L Barnes Ltd (Stuart Barnes) v HMRC — Upper Tribunal
Upper Tribunal | 2024
HMRC wins on appeal
The Sky Sports rugby pundit initially won at First-tier Tribunal, which focused heavily on his real-world working practices. The Upper Tribunal reversed on appeal — placing far greater weight on Sky's contractual rights: first call on his services, control over scheduling and appearances. Contractual terms trumped practical reality.
Takeaway: The contractual terms matter enormously. Even if your working reality is flexible, client rights baked into the contract — particularly scheduling control and right-of-first-call — can tip a determination inside.
George Mantides Ltd v HMRC — Upper Tribunal
Upper Tribunal | April 2025
HMRC wins
A consultant urologist working as a locum through a PSC for two NHS trusts was found inside IR35 for one engagement. The tribunal found sufficient mutuality from the moment sessions were booked and carried out — even on a short-term, terminable basis. Clinical rota structures and integration into trust operations pointed to employment.
Takeaway: Short-term or rolling engagements do not automatically create weak mutuality. If work is offered and accepted on a regular basis, that pattern can establish sufficient MoO even without formal guarantees of future work.
Bryan Robson Ltd v HMRC — First-tier Tribunal
First-tier Tribunal | 2024/25
Mixed result
The former footballer's ambassadorial work for Manchester United (event attendance, executive box visits, matchday appearances) was found inside IR35 — characterised as employment-like integration. However, a portion of fees attributed to image rights was found outside IR35, as genuine commercial exploitation of personal brand rather than personal service.
Takeaway: Integration into a client's operational activities — rostering, management, regular attendance — is a strong inside pointer. Separate, distinct revenue streams (genuine image rights, IP licensing) can be carved out and assessed separately.
Atholl House Productions Ltd (Kaye Adams) — Final FTT
First-tier Tribunal (post-remittal) | 2024
Contractor wins
After years of litigation and multiple rounds of appeal, the BBC presenter again prevailed. The FTT found substantial autonomy over her work, a varied income base across multiple clients, and genuine control over the content she produced. A long relationship with a single broadcaster does not automatically create IR35 employment — the quality of the relationship matters.
Takeaway: Genuine autonomy over the work product, a real wider business, and multiple income streams remain powerful indicators of self-employment. Duration of relationship alone is not determinative.

How to Strengthen an Outside IR35 Position

Based on the current case law and HMRC guidance, the strongest outside-IR35 positions share a consistent set of characteristics. None of these alone guarantees a favourable determination — each engagement must be assessed on its specific facts — but all are worth building into your working practices and contracts.

Contractual protections

  • Genuine right of substitution: Drafted as a real commercial right, not a theoretical clause. The client should be unable to veto a suitably qualified substitute. Document any time the right has been used or offered.
  • Project-based scoping: Define the engagement around a specific deliverable with a clear start and end — not open-ended services. Include a defined scope of work.
  • No exclusivity clause: You should be free to work with other clients. Any clause restricting this will be scrutinised.
  • Financial risk provisions: Fixed-price elements, warranty or remediation obligations at your cost, and responsibility for own insurance all support a business-to-business character.

Practical working arrangements

  • Control over method: You decide how the work is done. Outcomes and deliverables are agreed; the route to them is yours to determine.
  • Own equipment: Use your own hardware, software licences, and professional tools where possible.
  • Not integrated into client operations: Avoid being given a client email address, appearing on internal org charts, being included in performance appraisals, or attending internal social events as a matter of course.
  • Multiple clients: Maintain a genuine portfolio of clients. Financial dependence on one client is a significant inside pointer.

Documentation and audit trail

  • Conduct a documented IR35 assessment at the start of each engagement — and update it when terms or working practices change
  • Retain all contracts, correspondence, and working records that evidence the nature of the relationship
  • Use CEST as one data point — but supplement with a fuller analysis
  • Consider professional IR35 insurance if you are borderline
Nebula IR35 Hub

Nebula's IR35 Hub automates this process — assessing 20+ HMRC indicators against your specific engagement terms, producing an explainable determination with cited HMRC manual references, and maintaining a full audit trail. See how it works below.

If You Are Inside IR35

An inside-IR35 determination does not mean the engagement cannot proceed — but it does mean the tax treatment changes materially.

What changes

  • For medium/large or public sector clients: the fee payer (client or agency) deducts PAYE income tax and NICs before paying your Ltd company. Your Ltd receives a net payment.
  • For small private-sector clients: your Ltd company must account for a "deemed salary" through RTI, deducting PAYE and NICs and paying these to HMRC.
  • The deemed salary broadly equals your gross fee income from the engagement, less a 5% expense allowance (the Chapter 8 allowance — removed from Chapter 10 in 2021) and any allowable pension contributions.

PAYE set-off (from April 2024)

A significant 2024 reform: where HMRC pursues a fee payer or client for unpaid PAYE following a challenge, previously paid taxes — Corporation Tax on profits, and dividend taxes — can now be offset against the PAYE liability. This ends the double-taxation issue that was one of the most severe financial consequences of an inside IR35 finding. Penalties, however, still apply to the gross figure.

Challenging an inside determination

If you receive an inside-IR35 Status Determination Statement from a client that you believe is wrong:

  1. Request the written SDS with full reasons within 45 days of the determination
  2. Submit a formal dispute, providing evidence supporting an outside position
  3. The client must respond within 45 days — either issuing a revised SDS or confirming the original with reasons
  4. If unresolved, you can escalate to HMRC and, ultimately, to tribunal

Always seek professional advice before challenging a determination — the process has formal procedural requirements, and a poorly constructed dispute can weaken your position.

Related: MTD ITSA Explained

Making Tax Digital for Income Tax — Brief Summary

IR35 and MTD for ITSA often affect the same people — particularly contractors with sole-trader income alongside their Ltd company work, or those transitioning between trading structures. Here is what you need to know.

What is MTD for ITSA?

Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Self Assessment (MTD ITSA) replaces the annual Self Assessment tax return for eligible sole traders and landlords with a system of quarterly digital updates submitted via HMRC-compatible software, followed by an End of Period Statement and a Final Declaration.

Phase 1 — Live Now
6 April 2026
Income threshold: Over £50,000
Assessed using 2024/25 Self Assessment return
Phase 2
6 April 2027
Income threshold: Over £30,000
Assessed using 2025/26 Self Assessment return
Phase 3
6 April 2028
Income threshold: Over £20,000
Assessed using 2026/27 Self Assessment return

Who is in scope?

MTD ITSA applies to sole traders and landlords registered for Self Assessment. Qualifying income is gross turnover from self-employment and/or property — PAYE employment income, dividends, pensions, and investment income do not count towards the threshold. Ltd company directors receiving only salary and dividends from their company are not in scope under MTD ITSA.

Quarterly deadlines (2026/27)

QuarterPeriodSubmission Deadline
Q16 Apr – 5 Jul 20267 August 2026
Q26 Jul – 5 Oct 20267 November 2026
Q36 Oct – 5 Jan 20277 February 2027
Q46 Jan – 5 Apr 20277 May 2027
Final DeclarationFull year31 January 2028

Penalties

MTD ITSA uses a points-based penalty system. Each missed submission earns one penalty point. Reaching four points triggers a £200 financial penalty. Points expire after 12 months of full compliance. Note: Phase 1 has a grace period for quarterly submissions in 2026/27 — but the Final Declaration deadline of 31 January 2028 carries full penalty points from day one.

Automate Your IR35 Compliance with Nebula

Nebula's IR35 Hub assesses every engagement automatically — applying 20+ HMRC indicators, producing cited explainable determinations, and maintaining an audit trail. The only UK accounting platform built exclusively for Ltd contractors, by a FCCA-qualified accountant.

✓ Explainable AI determinations ✓ HMRC manual citations ✓ Full audit trail ✓ Dynamic updates on contract change